Save this picture!© Koichi Torimura+ 14 Share City:SetagayaCountry:JapanMore SpecsLess Specs Luxie, Mayumi Kondo 2010 Save this picture!© Koichi Torimura Save this picture!© Koichi TorimuraRecommended ProductsWoodParklex International S.L.Wood cladding – FacadeWood Boards / HPL PanelsEGGERPerfectSense Topmatt Worktops With EdgingResidential ApplicationsLunawoodLunawood Thermowood Façade and Decking in Project ÖA wooden private house built in 1986 with 2 stories was renovated to 2 apartment houses. In each floors, we made existing small rooms to convert one big room, and added a new entrance door for 2nd floor. One floor became for one dwelling unit.Save this picture!SectionThis was a 1980’s typical ordinary style house for mass public family. In many cases, we are difficult to find attractiveness in it. But this house had 2 japanese traditional style room which was installed ‘Shoji’, half transparent thin paper screen, on a sand wall in each floors. Save this picture!© Koichi TorimuraWe carefully chose and left some Japanese architectural elements and treated them as like fragment of space design. As the result, we made the total design in a way like editorial design of magazines, using Japanese style elements, new contemporary style and materials.Project gallerySee allShow lessSilo-top Studio / O-OFFICE ArchitectsSelected ProjectsThe Gravity Stool by Jólan van der Wiel, magnetic innovationArticles Share Year: photographs: Koichi TorimuraPhotographs: Koichi Torimura ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/490378/hanegi-g-house-makoto-yamaguchi-design Clipboard “COPY” 2010 Projects CopyHouses, Refurbishment•Setagaya, Japan “COPY” Architects: Makoto Yamaguchi Design Area Area of this architecture project Lighting Design: Area: 99 m² Area: 99 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project Year: Hanegi G – House / Makoto Yamaguchi DesignSave this projectSaveHanegi G – House / Makoto Yamaguchi Design CopyAbout this officeMakoto Yamaguchi DesignOfficeFollowProductWood#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesRefurbishmentSetagayaHousesRefurbishmentJapanPublished on March 27, 2014Cite: “Hanegi G – House / Makoto Yamaguchi Design” 27 Mar 2014. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021.
“COPY” CopyHouses, Renovation•Villasanta, Italy Photographs: Marcello MarianaSave this picture!© Marcello MarianaRecommended ProductsWindowsRabel Aluminium SystemsMinimal Casement Windows – Rabel 8400 Slim Super Thermal PlusEnclosures / Double Skin FacadesAlucoilStructural Honeycomb Panels – LarcorePorcelain StonewareCosentinoSurfaces – Dekton® Chromica CollectionWindowsVitrocsaMinimalist Window – SlidingText description provided by the architects. This project comprises the reconstruction of the attic by modifying the volume of the building. We didn’t intend to cover the existing volume, thus the new attic redesigns the whole building and creates a brand new architecture.Save this picture!© Marcello MarianaThe reconstruction is executed on the existing roof and it gives the building a great quality. We conceived the new roof by restricting and expanding the volume, and by adding some elements.Save this picture!© Marcello Mariana It is modeled on the existing plan and it is inserted into the existing space. We wanted to give the building a sense of unity, thus we added new windows and reconstructed the roof.Save this picture!Ground Floor PlanEach window is addressed towards a specific corner of the landscape. The windows have a twofold nature : the main ones are located near the terraces. Therefore, from the outside, they are not so standing out. The other windows are located in harmony with the existing ones. The element located on the roof gives way to the zenith lighting and enables ventilation.Save this picture!© Marcello MarianaWe made various models in different scales in order to study the new volume. The roof is clad in a light-grey pre-patinated Rheinzink coating.Save this picture!Upper Floor PlanWe reflected upon the sense of unity of the building with its surroundings. We used alternatively white and green colours, both natural and artificial to show the contrast of the building with the wide surrounding garden.Save this picture!© Marcello MarianaProject gallerySee allShow lessGeopark / Helen & HardSelected ProjectsIntersections 2015Event Share ArchDaily “COPY” Projects Italy Casa EG / ES-ArchSave this projectSaveCasa EG / ES-Arch Save this picture!© Marcello Mariana+ 37 Share Architects: ES-arch Photographs ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/636201/casa-eg-es-arch Clipboard ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/636201/casa-eg-es-arch Clipboard Casa EG / ES-Arch CopyAbout this officeES-archOfficeFollowProductsWoodSteel#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesRefurbishmentRenovationVillasantaHousesRefurbishmentRenovationItalyPublished on June 06, 2015Cite: “Casa EG / ES-Arch” 05 Jun 2015. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021.
Save this picture!© Deed Studio+ 24 Share “COPY” Brutal Variety / Ero Architects ArchDaily Housing Photographs: Deed Studio Manufacturers Brands with products used in this architecture project Area: 430 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project Iran Projects Manufacturers: Atrina, DibaDesign Team:Sina Ehsani, Ali Abdolbaghi, Amir Akbarzad, Shayan Anvari, Ziba Golemola,, Neda Bozorgi, Erfan ShabaniDesigning Manager:Sina EhsaniCivil Engineering:Hossein NaghizadehMechanical:Eng. DaliliElectrical:Atrina Co.Executive Manager:Ali AbdolbaghiExecutive Associate:Behnoud Ghasemloo3D:Shayan AnvariModel:Soroush EhsaniClient:Karim Shirzad, Ali HajinoormohammadiGround Floor Area:285 sqmBuilt Area:2280 sqmArchitects In Charge:Sina Ehsani, Ali Abdolbaghi, Amir AkbarzadCity:TehranCountry:IranMore SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!© Deed StudioRecommended ProductsFiber Cements / CementsULMA Architectural SolutionsPaper Facade Panel in Leioa School RestorationMetallicsStudcoWall Stop Ends – EzyCapWoodGustafsWood Veneered Wall & Ceiling PanelsWoodLunawoodThermowood FacadesText description provided by the architects. The Clients need was to design a 5 unit apartment, located in northern Tehran. First of all, private spaces (bedrooms) were located in north of the building and kitchen and bedroom and living room on the south to face the wooded view and sunlight. The building access is through a short and tiny dead end and the north facade faces it. One important challenge in the design of the north façade was to bold it so that it could appear enough in the dead end alley, without any extra element or ornament. On the other words, windows and the façade texture were the only important elements to be designed. Save this picture!© Deed StudioOn the first step, northern windows ( bedroom windows) were randomly moved in each bedroom to diversify the façade design. Next, the windows were rotated to bold the façade dimension so that it could be seen better from the beginning of the dead end. These rotated windows are between folded walls that are made by exposed concrete with wooden texture, to be better expressed without any covering material preventing them to be thick. Playing of light and shadow on the volumes of façade and the concrete texture has made the design more attractive. Save this picture!© Deed StudioSave this picture!Floor PlanSave this picture!© Deed StudioThe green touch of the flowers is an inseperable element of the design and therefore the flowerboxes are automatically been irrigated. In southern façade, sunlight and view were the main parameters. The wide windows of living rooms are open to the neighboring garden and to control the sunlight, shading frames are used all around the windows. The interior of units have various spaces and has completely modern design by using high quality materials instead of diversity of colors and textures. Finally, the design elements are familiar to each other while they are variable and different and altogether making a Brutal Variety. Save this picture!© Deed StudioProject gallerySee allShow lessWoodpeckers / Ström ArchitectsSelected ProjectsOyamadai House / frontofficetokyoSelected ProjectsProject locationAddress:Ehteshamiyeh, Tehran, Tehran Province, IranLocation to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address. Share “COPY” Brutal Variety / Ero ArchitectsSave this projectSaveBrutal Variety / Ero Architects Year: 2015 ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/797655/brutal-variety-ero-architects Clipboard Photographs ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/797655/brutal-variety-ero-architects Clipboard CopyAbout this officeEro ArchitectsOfficeFollowProductConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousingTehranIranPublished on October 21, 2016Cite: “Brutal Variety / Ero Architects” 20 Oct 2016. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021.
ArchDaily Projects Area: 613 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project Villa 9 10 / EURK Buildesign Manufacturers: Cuore Mexico, Divicun, Grupo MEGACollaborators:Ing. Sergio Canto Payán, Arq. Roxana Cardeña Méndez, Arq. Graciela Barbosa, Ing. Jose Carlos Rodríguez Bernes, Muralista Carlos Segovia.Architects In Charge:MAA. Roberto Díaz BragaCity:CancúnCountry:MexicoMore SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!© Tamara UribeRecommended ProductsWoodAccoyaAccoya® Cladding, Siding & FacadesRenders / 3D AnimationEnscape3D Real-Time Rendering SoftwareWoodParklex International S.L.Wood cladding – FacadeWoodTechnowoodPergola SystemsText description provided by the architects. Villa 910 is located inside a housing complex in hotel zone of Cancun, Quintana Roo. Over the last couple of years this particular area has had a growing demand, due to its privileged location between two amazing views, the Caribbean Sea with its crystalline waters and to the Nichupte lagoon, with its unforgettable sunsets.Save this picture!© Tamara UribeVilla 910 arises from the union of 2 villas, which were demolished entirely to construct only one villa that could fulfil the client´s spatial needs.Save this picture!© Tamara UribeSave this picture!Lower floor planThe new proposal seeks to reestablish the connection of the landscape between both views, wich were previously interrupted by the housing complex. This was accomplished by creating vertical flows throughout the house. The main element is the staircase, which sets the pace as a generating element in the architectonic program.Save this picture!© Tamara UribeThe facades respond to the housing complex regulations, yet the form creates a rupture in the general orthogonality of the complex. As for the interior design, the material pallet was abstracted from the coral reefs that surround the location, as a result of this abstraction, vibrant and colorful living spaces were generated troughout the house, concluded with an amazing mural by Carlos Segovia.Save this picture!© Tamara UribeSave this picture!Section 01The architectural program of the villa is developed in 4 levels. The basement was destined for the social area and the domestic arrangements, each one with its independent access. The ground floor contains the public areas of the villa; living room, dining room, and kitchen, all together without divisions, creating a free space, in which as soon as you enter you can see the indoor outdoor connection.Save this picture!© Tamara UribeThe 6 bedrooms are located in the two upper levels. They all have outdoor terraces to enjoy the views that surround them. Leaving the best for last, in the highest level an outdoor pool was constructed next to the master bedroom, it surely is one of the best spots to relax and gaze upon the ocean.Save this picture!© Tamara UribeProject gallerySee allShow lessCLUE: INTERNATIONAL LIGHTING COMPETITION FOR STUDENTS AND YOUNG PROFESSIONALSBuilt Projects & MasterplansChilean Houses And Their Kitchens In DetailArticlesProject locationAddress:Cancún, Quintana Roo, MexicoLocation to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address. Share Save this picture!© Tamara Uribe+ 23Curated by Danae Santibañez Share Mexico ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/894110/villa-9-10-eurk-buildesign Clipboard ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/894110/villa-9-10-eurk-buildesign Clipboard Villa 9 10 / EURK BuildesignSave this projectSaveVilla 9 10 / EURK Buildesign CopyAbout this officeEURK BuildesignOfficeFollowProductConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousingCancúnMexicoPublished on February 07, 2019Cite: “Villa 9 10 / EURK Buildesign” [Villa 9 10 / EURK Buildesign] 07 Feb 2019. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021.
2019 ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/942038/south-villa-arrcc Clipboard ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/942038/south-villa-arrcc Clipboard South Villa / ARRCCSave this projectSaveSouth Villa / ARRCCSave this picture!© Adam Letch & Niel Vosloo+ 21Curated by Hana Abdel Share ArchDaily Photographs Area: 200 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project Interior Designers: ARRCC Area Area of this architecture project South Villa / ARRCC South Africa Photographs: Adam Letch & Niel Vosloo Manufacturers Brands with products used in this architecture project Manufacturers: AutoDesk, Made, OKHA, 4Ward Design, ACT 3D, Allround Pools, BFH De Jager, OGGIE, Tenebris Lab Projects CopyAbout this officeARRCCOfficeFollow#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousingPenthouseBuildingsResidentialInterior DesignCape TownOn FacebookSouth AfricaPublished on July 25, 2020Cite: “South Villa / ARRCC” 25 Jul 2020. ArchDaily. Accessed 10 Jun 2021.
203 total views, 1 views today London fundraising salaries up by an average 1.27%, Kage Partnership reveals 204 total views, 2 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis7 AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis7 2017 saw fundraisers in London receive an average 1.27% salary increase, according to recruitment firm Kage Partnership’s annual analysis.The increase is slightly up on 2017’s and 2016’s 1% increases, with 10 out of 14 categories showing increases: the most for a number of years according to Kage Partnership’s Fundraising Salary Survey 2018.The survey has been compiled from data on over 330 fundraising vacancies, from 136 charities that registered with Kage Partnership between January and December 2017. Salaries include London weighting.The Officer level category showed the highest average increases at 3.44%, with salaries ranging from £24k up to £39k. However, the biggest single increase across all categories and levels was the Corporate Manager category at 7.5%. Manager level showed the biggest individual category increases and decreases overall. Community fundraising salaries stayed level.Head and Director of Fundraising salaries ranged from £45k to £72.5k, with an average of £54.5k.According to Kage Partnership, there are still more jobs than candidates with salaries increasing more markedly last year than in past years, which it suggests could be to do with charities having to pay to attract staff to ‘in demand’ roles. It reports that the most ‘wanted’ candidates fall within the corporate new business, trust and foundations, major donor and individual giving areas, which are the categories showing the largest salary increases. It is also seeing fundraisers being tempted out of roles after short periods, often skipping rungs on the career ladder in the process. About Melanie May Melanie May is a journalist and copywriter specialising in writing both for and about the charity and marketing services sectors since 2001. She can be reached via www.thepurplepim.com. Advertisement Melanie May | 19 January 2018 | News Tagged with: Finance Fundraising Director Salary Research / statistics
Organisation News BrazilAmericas Follow the news on Brazil April 27, 2021 Find out more Receive email alerts RSF begins research into mechanisms for protecting journalists in Latin America Alarm after two journalists murdered in Brazil Reports BrazilAmericas 2011-2020: A study of journalist murders in Latin America confirms the importance of strengthening protection policies Help by sharing this information May 13, 2009 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Victory as federal supreme court repeals dictatorship era press law News RSF_en to go further Reporters Without Borders today saluted as a “great victory for press freedom” the historic decision of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) to repeal the entire 1967 press law that had allowed prison sentences to be handed down to journalists for what they wrote.The worldwide press freedom organisation said the decision was even more welcome coming as it did just before World Press Freedom day on 3 May.The country’s highest jurisdiction voted yesterday by seven votes to four to sweep away the repressive law which had been adopted under the 1964-1985 military dictatorship. Federal deputy Miro Teixeira was behind the 2007 call on the STF to revoke the 9 February 1967 law that provided for prison sentences for press offences. The court had on 27 February 2008 suspended on an initial six-month basis – that was extended the following September – the application of 20 of the 70 articles of the law. These were the most repressive ones relating to “defamation, “insult”, and “denigration, all of which meant an increase of sentences already under laid down under criminal law.“The 1967 press law continued to be used for a long time after the return of democracy in 1985 as a means of applying pressure or reprisals against journalists,” the press freedom organisation said.“The 1967 law was also in conflict with the principles enshrined in the 1988 democratic constitution. This judicial absurdity had to be resolved. This law moreover had the avowed intention of gagging the press by increasing sentences laid down under the criminal law for some offences of opinion”, it said.With the total repealing of this law, the rule of law has now triumphed against the ‘dark years’, making it a victory for democracy”, the organisation concludedIt was the articles made void by the 1988 Constitution that fuelled most the debate. Some judges on the STF wanted to keep them for use in “protection of private life, and for people’s reputation and image”. A further legal wrangle centred on the right of reply which was part of the 1967 law. The judges who backed repealing the entire legislation pointed out that this right was already guaranteed under earlier 1923 legislation and the Article 5 of the constitution. Miro Teixeira who set the legal ball rolling had argued that “no law should ever be able to influence the content of news”. The doyen of the STF judges, Celso de Mello, picked up the same theme at the end of the debate, saying, “Nothing is more harmful and dangerous than the state seeking to regulate freedom of expression and freedom of thought”. News April 15, 2021 Find out more May 13, 2021 Find out more
News UpdatesDowry Death- Society Has Got The Wrong Message That In-Laws Can Easily Escape Liability If They Live Separately From Victim: Madras HC Sparsh Upadhyay21 April 2021 4:52 AMShare This – xMere giving birth to a child and providing shelter and good education, and motivating their child to get a job alone is not enough, and the first and foremost responsibility of the parents is that they should groom their children as responsible citizens: Madras HCWhile refusing to suspend the sentence awarded to a couple convicted for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC, the Madras High Court recently observed that the first and foremost responsibility of the parents is to groom their children as responsible citizens. Underlining that the incidents of women committing suicide are rising day by day (due to dowry harassment), the Bench…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginWhile refusing to suspend the sentence awarded to a couple convicted for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC, the Madras High Court recently observed that the first and foremost responsibility of the parents is to groom their children as responsible citizens. Underlining that the incidents of women committing suicide are rising day by day (due to dowry harassment), the Bench Justice P. Velmurugan observed that the in-laws of the victim woman are escaping from their liability saying that they are not living with their son. However, the Court noted that despite living separately, they are inducing their son for getting dowry, by way of, money, jewels, two-wheeler, car etc. The Court also underlined that it has come across several petitions wherein in-laws have argued that since they are not residing with their son and the victim women, their sentence should be suspension of sentence. The Court further added, “Taking advantage of that, a wrong message has gone to the Society that the parents can easily escape from their liability and the alleged offence.” Interestingly, the Court also opined, “Mere giving birth to a child and providing shelter and good education, and motivating their child to get a job alone is not enough, and the first and foremost responsibility of the parents is that they should groom their children as responsible citizens.” The matter before the Court The petitioners before the Court (accused 2 and 3) are the parents of the first accused, viz., the husband of the deceased. The marriage between the first accused and the deceased was solemnized on 20.06.2016. As the petitioners/Parents of the Man used to beat and harass the deceased by demanding jewels and money, the deceased suffered mental agony and therefore, she committed suicide on 29th September 2017. Subsequently, a case was registered by the respondent-Police against the first accused and the petitioners/ Parents of the Man for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC and 304 B of IPC. The petitioners/ Parents of the Man were found guilty under Section 498-A of IPC and convicted, thus, against such finding, the Criminal Appeal had been filed by them alone. Along with the instant present Crl.M.P.No.2926 of 2021 had been filed seeking to suspend the sentence. It was argued on their behalf that the petitioners / accused 2 and 3 never lived under the same roof (with the deceased woman), and as such, there was no possibility for demanding dowry and causing cruelty, as alleged by the prosecution. However, refusing to suspend the sentence, the Court noted, “From the materials available on record, there are materials against the petitioners and the learned Sessions Judge, on proper appreciation of materials available on record against the petitioners / accused 2 and 3, convicted them for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC, and acquitted them of the charge under Section 304-B of IPC.” Given the nature and gravity of the offence committed by the accused, the Court didn’t suspend the sentence and the miscellaneous petition was dismissed.Click Here To Download OrderRead OrderSubscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Story
News UpdatesKerala High Court Issues Notice On Pleas Challenging Centre’s COVID Vaccination Policy Lydia Suzanne Thomas27 April 2021 2:45 AMShare This – xThe Kerala High Court today issued notice to the Centre on the challenge to the Liberalised Pricing and Accelerated National COVID -19 Vaccination Strategy (Vaccine Policy) and to the private party vaccine manufacturers on the differential pricing strategies. A Bench of Justices Ashok Menon and Murali Purshothaman declined to pass interim orders at this time and expressed inclination to take the matter up after the Supreme Court took up the COVID-19 proceedings instituted on its own motion.During hearing Advocate Haris Beeran for one of the petitioners Dr MK Muneer strenuously sought for a posting prior to April 30 so that the Centre could respond on why the States were required to pay private parties for vaccines procured to vaccinate those between the ages of 18-45 and could to obtain them free for vaccinations of those above 45.”This is manifestly arbitrary”, he averred.A counsel for another petitioner expressed angst that the “country should be held to ransom by two companies”.Issuing notice, the Court decided to seek responses from the private companies, Serum Institute and Bharat Biotech on the matter of differential pricing alone, while seeking the Government’s statements on the vaccine policy itself, since the same “is a policy decision”.With this, the Court proceeded to post the matter for hearing on the first week of March. The first petition before the Court, was filed by CPI(M) leader and candidate for the Palakkad constituency in the Kerala Assembly Elections, Advocate CP Promod. His petition primarily contends that the policy excludes persons in the age group of 18-45 years from the free vaccine quota of the Centre, which amounts to illegal discrimination. Among other grounds, the petition filed through Advocates Athul Shaji and Anwin John Antony assails the differentiated pricing for the vaccines, the deviation from the principle that vaccines have to be procured at the Central level for distribution to the states, and leaving the States to compete for the vaccines in the open market. The exclusion of citizens aged below 45 (who comprise 79% of the population) – from eligibility for free vaccines is an unreasonable classification, amounting to hostile discrimination under Article 14 and “is wholly prejudicial to development of Herd Immunity by way of Universal Immunisation”, the petitioner urges in addition. The second plea, was moved this morning by Deputy Leader of Opposition in the Kerala Legislative Assembly Dr MK Muneer through Advocate Haris Beeran also makes the case that the vaccine policy is discriminatory in that it excludes those in the 18-24 year category from the Centre’s free vaccine pool.The petition terms the Policy’s aim to shift the burden of vaccinating the populace upon the states as ‘manifestly arbitrary and discriminatory.’Asserting that by reason of the vaccine policy, many states “were up in arms”, the petition reads, “Asking state governments to compete in open market for vaccine procurement while Centre keeps an assured quota for itself is ‘manifestly arbitrary and discriminatory'” Therefore, the petition prays for direction to Centre – to take over vaccine programme in accordance with the National Disaster Management Planvaccinate citizens free of costmake Covid vaccines available at uniform prices for Centre and StatesA third plea was also presented to court by Dr K Aravindan a member of the expert panel on COVID-19 constituted by the Government of Kerala and Dr Praveen G Pai, a Public Health Specialist. and who were represented by Advocate Prashanth S and lawyers of Software Freedom Law Center. the petition primarily assails the decision to charge for vaccinations of those between 18-45 and the differential pricing structure followed between the Centre and the State.The decision to allow vaccine companies to have a three tier price structure with differential pricing for the central and state governments will result in low coverage of the targeted population thereby putting at risk the entire population of India, impinging upon the right to health and right to life, it is contended.Stating that the vaccines ought to fall under the National Essential Medicines list which is a list of essential drugs that have their prices capped, the petition raises an additional prayer seeking that intellectual property rights in the vaccines are allocated to more manufacturers so as to achieve the universal immunization of Indian citizens. There are at least 19 capable vaccine manufacturers as listed in the National Health Profile, 2019, it is additionally asserted in the plea.TagsCOVID -19 #Covid Vaccine covid-19 Vaccine Kerala High Court Justice Ashok Menon Justice Murali Purshothaman Next Story
Previous Article Next Article Physical ailments are a £35bn pain in the neck for USOn 2 Dec 2003 in Personnel Today Comments are closed. Sub-standard job performance caused by pain costs US employers more thanUS$60bn (£35bn) a year in lost productivity, according to a study published inthe Journal of the American Medical Association. Headaches were the most frequently cited medical condition causing problemsat work, followed by back pain, foot pain, arthritis and other joint and muscleaches. Menstrual pain and toothaches were excluded from the research. The authors suggested that employers could cut costs by being more in tunewith their workers’ needs, launching office campaigns to promote treatmentoptions, displaying charts explaining how to lift heavy objects, and usingsimple pain prevention techniques (such as positioning computer monitorscorrectly). Researchers telephoned 28,902 workers in blue and white-collar jobs to askthem about any absent days or lost on-the-job productivity during the previoustwo weeks, and about specific types of pain that might have contributed. Nearly53 per cent reported having pain during the previous two weeks, and 13 per centsaid they had a pain-related loss in productivity. The average amount of losttime was 4.6 hours per week. http://jama.ama-assn.org/ Related posts:No related photos.